<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MWynne.com Photography &#124; Blog &#124; Architectural, Commercial and Editorial Boston Photographer &#187; Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mwynne.com/index.php/category/reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mwynne.com</link>
	<description>MWynne.com Photography is dedicated to providing you with the images you need, when you need them.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:42:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>P6000 Used, Abused, and Finally Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://blog.mwynne.com/index.php/2009/10/21/p6000-used-abused-and-finally-reviewed/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mwynne.com/index.php/2009/10/21/p6000-used-abused-and-finally-reviewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Wynne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Just Me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P6000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pocket Wizard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Point and Shoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Table Top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mwynne.com/?p=206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Again, at the beginning of the summer&#8230; I was in the buying mood. I needed a camera that I would give to almost anyone (aka an assistant) and get decent photo and video clips for blog posts. With very little research I was able to narrow my selections to three cameras.

1. Cannon&#8217;s G10
2. Nikon&#8217;s P6000
3. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, at the beginning of the summer&#8230; I was in the buying mood. I needed a camera that I would give to almost anyone (aka an assistant) and get decent photo and video clips for blog posts. With very little research I was able to narrow my selections to three cameras.</p>
<ul>
<li>1. Cannon&#8217;s G10</li>
<li>2. Nikon&#8217;s P6000</li>
<li>3. Panasonic&#8217;s LX3</li>
</ul>
<p>Without getting to involved here with comparisons, I went with Nikon&#8217;s P6000.</p>
<table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td>
<img src="http://blog.mwynne.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/MWynne_091021_1271.jpg" alt="Nikon&#039;s P6000" title="Nikon&#039;s P6000" style="border:1px solid #000000" />
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>I have been using it for the past few months and feel comfortable reviewing it here.</p>
<p><span id="more-206"></span></p>
<table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td>
<img src="http://blog.mwynne.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/MWynne_091021_1274.jpg" alt="Nikon&#039;s P6000 Rear" title="Nikon&#039;s P6000 Rear" style="border:1px solid #000000" />
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>The basic layout of the camera follows in line with any other Nikon I have used. It is very easy to operate without entering the menu&#8217;s so long as you take the time to set the camera up the way you like it. There is a quick My Menu button on the back that allows you to list the functions that are the most important to you. This is a great feature when you actually intend to use the camera for work.</p>
<p>I have quick access to the various flash controls for quickly swapping external flashes and pocket wizards for set up shots and detail shots on job sites. Nothing that goes to the client just quirky things for blog posts and tweets.</p>
<p>You can see in the photos above that the camera does have a hot shoe. This can be used for flashes, Nikon CLS support included, or pocket wizard&#8217;s. Really anything you can mount in a hot shoe will go in there and fire, so long as you (or your assistant) don&#8217;t mind looking like a complete idiot. Even a PW is bigger than this camera but thats kind of the whole point in getting it to bring along. <em>(For it to be small and easy to carry, not to look like an idiot)</em></p>
<p>There is a big sticker on the front of this tiny camera that brags about its ability to shoot at ISO 6400. This sticker is perhaps far more embarrassing than the way the camera looks with an SB900 mounted on top. The files are almost unusable beyond ISO 400, unless you really love Chromatic Noise. Not a big deal though, I wasn&#8217;t interested in low light performance from a small camera, and none of the other options are any better at this. The good news is that you can tell the camera what ISO you want to use or you can give it a max ISO for the automatic ISO setting.</p>
<p>My biggest complaint with this camera is the lens. Zoomed in the Aperture becomes 7.1 while zoomed out the aperture can go to 2.7. I would love to see Nikon go the way that Panasonic went. Less zoom range but a consistently wide aperture. Small sensors just can&#8217;t handle small apertures. They end up with vignettes that leave images looking soft, very soft at 7.1. The glass doesn&#8217;t matter, the angles are just to dramatic for the sensor.</p>
<table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td>
<img src="http://blog.mwynne.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/MWynne_091021_1275.jpg" alt="Nikon&#039;s P6000 w/lens Extended" title="Nikon&#039;s P6000 w/lens Extended" style="border:1px solid #000000" />
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>All things considered, I think that Nikon did a great job with this camera. It is right on par with the G10 from Cannon but if I had it to do over, I would get the Panasonic LX3. They have done a much better job of recognizing the failings of small sensors and working with them rather than fighting them. The aperture stability alone is a huge advantage but it also offers 720p video recording and while I am happy with the short clips that the P6000 produces, 720p would head and shoulders above in quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mwynne.com/index.php/2009/10/21/p6000-used-abused-and-finally-reviewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elinchrom BX500Ri Monolights &#8211; Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://blog.mwynne.com/index.php/2009/10/19/elinchrom-bx500ri-monolights-reviewed/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mwynne.com/index.php/2009/10/19/elinchrom-bx500ri-monolights-reviewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Wynne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Just Me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Photographer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Durability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elinchrom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entry Pro Compact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monolights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mwynne.com/?p=185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, at the beginning of the summer I went shopping for monolights. It took me a month or two to commit to a purchase after reading review after review, but I finally settled on Elinchrom&#8217;s BX500Ri.







I went with Elinchrom for a lot of reason&#8217;s, and so far I am not disappointed.

The BX500Ri monolight is considered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, at the beginning of the summer I went shopping for monolights. It took me a month or two to commit to a purchase after reading review after review, but I finally settled on Elinchrom&#8217;s BX500Ri.</p>
<table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td>
<img src="http://blog.mwynne.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/MWynne_091019_1239.jpg" alt="Elinchrom BX500Ri against white background" title="Elinchrom BX500Ri" style="border:1px solid #000000" />
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>I went with <a href="http://www.elinchrom.com" title="Visit Elinchrom's Site" target="_blank">Elinchrom</a> for a lot of reason&#8217;s, and so far I am not disappointed.</p>
<p><span id="more-185"></span></p>
<p>The BX500Ri monolight is considered one of Elinchrom&#8217;s &#8220;Entry Pro Compacts&#8221;. The biggest differences are variance and build. I didn&#8217;t need a particularly wide power range for these lights since I only intend to use them when I need more power than a speedlight or in combination with a 2400 pack. If I ever need less power out of a head for any reason, I keep ND&#8217;s with me on location anyway, and paper towels work if I forget to bring ND&#8217;s.</p>
<p>My biggest concern with these particular heads was build quality. I had read a few reviews complaining about the handle and the mounting hardware. After using them for the past few months though, I would have to say that they are pretty durable. If you treat your gear with ANY respect you shouldn&#8217;t have to worry about the casings, they are pretty tough.</p>
<p>The bulbs however scare me. There is no option to put a protective dome over the flash tube and modeling light. So every time you change modifiers you risk hitting and breaking the tube. This is a pretty big risk, but if I had to do it over I would still go with these lights.</p>
<p>The interface is incredibly easy. The power is adjusted with the push of a button. Your power level is displayed digitally and can be controlled in 1/10th of a stop increments. The increment can be adjusted to your needs and the same control is applied to the modeling light settings, push button on/off and power control.</p>
<table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td>
<img src="http://blog.mwynne.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/MWynne_091019_1240.jpg" alt="Elinchrom BX500Ri Controls displayed against a white background" title="BX500Ri Controls" style="border:1px solid #000000" />
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>The system comes with Elinchrom&#8217;s amazing Skyport system built in or accepts a mono jack sync cord. If you don&#8217;t have the Skyport system and run out of wireless receivers, each head has a built in optical slave that is far more consistent than any other optic I have worked with.</p>
<p>The ready chirps can be turned off easily or adjusted to be less annoying. Each head goes up to 500ws and can be adjusted as low as 31ws. This is a problem for some, 31ws just isn&#8217;t low enough in a small working space, but two sheets of .9 ND and the power is dropped below 8ws. Of course you could just use a speedlight if you need to drop that low.</p>
<p>Overall I am very happy with these lights. If I had it to do over I would make the same choice and I guess that says enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mwynne.com/index.php/2009/10/19/elinchrom-bx500ri-monolights-reviewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
