This is unlikely to actually occur, but along the way I come across all types of work. Good, bad… everything in between and it shocks me how high the percentage is of good work being shown at the F Stop Magazine. They find all types of photographers and display their work to the world. I am not sure what their readership is like, but any one that isnt watching them should be.

Here is a link to the most recent article they have posted. Check it out if you get a chance and don’t forget to bookmark their RSS.

• 1. Cannon’s G10
• 2. Nikon’s P6000
• 3. Panasonic’s LX3

Without getting to involved here with comparisons, I went with Nikon’s P6000.

I have been using it for the past few months and feel comfortable reviewing it here.

The basic layout of the camera follows in line with any other Nikon I have used. It is very easy to operate without entering the menu’s so long as you take the time to set the camera up the way you like it. There is a quick My Menu button on the back that allows you to list the functions that are the most important to you. This is a great feature when you actually intend to use the camera for work.

I have quick access to the various flash controls for quickly swapping external flashes and pocket wizards for set up shots and detail shots on job sites. Nothing that goes to the client just quirky things for blog posts and tweets.

You can see in the photos above that the camera does have a hot shoe. This can be used for flashes, Nikon CLS support included, or pocket wizard’s. Really anything you can mount in a hot shoe will go in there and fire, so long as you (or your assistant) don’t mind looking like a complete idiot. Even a PW is bigger than this camera but thats kind of the whole point in getting it to bring along. (For it to be small and easy to carry, not to look like an idiot)

There is a big sticker on the front of this tiny camera that brags about its ability to shoot at ISO 6400. This sticker is perhaps far more embarrassing than the way the camera looks with an SB900 mounted on top. The files are almost unusable beyond ISO 400, unless you really love Chromatic Noise. Not a big deal though, I wasn’t interested in low light performance from a small camera, and none of the other options are any better at this. The good news is that you can tell the camera what ISO you want to use or you can give it a max ISO for the automatic ISO setting.

My biggest complaint with this camera is the lens. Zoomed in the Aperture becomes 7.1 while zoomed out the aperture can go to 2.7. I would love to see Nikon go the way that Panasonic went. Less zoom range but a consistently wide aperture. Small sensors just can’t handle small apertures. They end up with vignettes that leave images looking soft, very soft at 7.1. The glass doesn’t matter, the angles are just to dramatic for the sensor.

All things considered, I think that Nikon did a great job with this camera. It is right on par with the G10 from Cannon but if I had it to do over, I would get the Panasonic LX3. They have done a much better job of recognizing the failings of small sensors and working with them rather than fighting them. The aperture stability alone is a huge advantage but it also offers 720p video recording and while I am happy with the short clips that the P6000 produces, 720p would head and shoulders above in quality.

I went with Elinchrom for a lot of reason’s, and so far I am not disappointed.

The BX500Ri monolight is considered one of Elinchrom’s “Entry Pro Compacts”. The biggest differences are variance and build. I didn’t need a particularly wide power range for these lights since I only intend to use them when I need more power than a speedlight or in combination with a 2400 pack. If I ever need less power out of a head for any reason, I keep ND’s with me on location anyway, and paper towels work if I forget to bring ND’s.

My biggest concern with these particular heads was build quality. I had read a few reviews complaining about the handle and the mounting hardware. After using them for the past few months though, I would have to say that they are pretty durable. If you treat your gear with ANY respect you shouldn’t have to worry about the casings, they are pretty tough.

The bulbs however scare me. There is no option to put a protective dome over the flash tube and modeling light. So every time you change modifiers you risk hitting and breaking the tube. This is a pretty big risk, but if I had to do it over I would still go with these lights.

The interface is incredibly easy. The power is adjusted with the push of a button. Your power level is displayed digitally and can be controlled in 1/10th of a stop increments. The increment can be adjusted to your needs and the same control is applied to the modeling light settings, push button on/off and power control.

The system comes with Elinchrom’s amazing Skyport system built in or accepts a mono jack sync cord. If you don’t have the Skyport system and run out of wireless receivers, each head has a built in optical slave that is far more consistent than any other optic I have worked with.

The ready chirps can be turned off easily or adjusted to be less annoying. Each head goes up to 500ws and can be adjusted as low as 31ws. This is a problem for some, 31ws just isn’t low enough in a small working space, but two sheets of .9 ND and the power is dropped below 8ws. Of course you could just use a speedlight if you need to drop that low.

Overall I am very happy with these lights. If I had it to do over I would make the same choice and I guess that says enough.

    For starters, I have changed all of my page titles. This is what appears at the top of the window to tell you which page it is as well as what shows up in the header for the search results. My pages were previously titled “MWynne.com Photography – Page” (Page being Home, About, etc.) This made my ranking jump for people that search for “mwynne” or “mwynne photography” but for all the people out there that don’t already know who I am… it wasn’t doing much good. Now my titles are “MWynne.com Photography | Page | Architectural, Editorial and Lifestyle Boston Photographer”. Basicly I have just thrown in some more keywords for the crawlers to find.

    Next, I created second copies of all my pages and eliminated the dynamic photos to be replaced by good old fashioned text.

    Here is a cutout of my webpage dynamically, using photos with the text fonts and styles that I like:

    Now this is using text for SEO:

    The differences are subtle, it is only in the appearance of the text but, for a photographer, appearances are everything. Now I jut have two versions of my website, one for everyone to view and one just for search engines and mobile users.

    I did the same thing with my galleries. I like the look of an embedded flash gallery, but search engines can’t see what is going on. So now I have a gallery the way I like it and a copy for search engines and mobile devices.

    This is the flash version:

    And this is the HTML version:

    HTML isn’t as pretty but now search engines can see the content as well as mobile users(iphone requires yet another gallery version). All this to climb the ranks on search engines and I am sure that there is still more that will have to be done later. My biggest concern right now is that google is seeing more of my site than I thought and now I am going to get hit for repeat content.

    One last thing, incoming links are huge for search engines, and the text in the line is just as important. I try to comment on other peoples blogs as much as I can with Boston Photographer as my nickname. To see how it is working just do a search for Boston Photographer

    There are basic elements that I look at while I go through my initial edit on any group of photographs. Color is among them and when I saw this photo I new I hit the color just right. I love the separation of the white on blue.

    This photo was taken with on camera flash bounced into the ceiling behind me to camera left, creating a very flattering light across the bride. When I look at the photo however, it’s not my light that draws me to this photo. The ambient bleeding into the background adds everything to this photograph.

    It is the difference in ambient level that caused me to take notice of this image. The photo to the right is almost the exact same photograph but without the ambient level. I came across this photograph first and didn’t even hesitate to flip right past it. The photo that followed however, the one with the blue background, stopped me dead in my tracks.

    There are obvious compositional flaws in both of these images but I would not hesitate to show the image with the blue background to the bride and groom because of the emotional pull of the ambient light. If you look at the back of your camera and your images aren’t popping off the display while you are using flash, try dragging the shutter a bit(slower shutter speed) or just Jumping up the ISO and see what happens.

    So the lesson to be taken from this quick tip is to pay close attention to the ambient levels in your photos. Most times, they can make or break the image. ]]> http://blog.mwynne.com/index.php/2008/10/01/dont-forget-the-ambient/feed/ 0